When a company evaluates outsourcing their hardware management, the conversation usually starts off on the wrong foot: with the price of the service. That price is not compared to anything, because almost no one has calculated how much it costs to manage hardware internally.
That cost is diluted and hard to see. It is in the time of three different people. It is in the equipment that was never returned. It is in the rushed purchases that ended up costing more. And it is in the hours your IT Manager spent coordinating logistics instead of doing IT.
This guide shows you how to calculate that number yourself, with real data.
The cost of managing hardware internally is almost always invisible
The problem with hidden costs is that they do not appear on any budget line. No one has a line item that says "time wasted on hardware management". But the cost is there.
In tech companies with remote teams, managing hardware involves more than one role. IT coordinates configuration and support. HR manages onboarding and offboarding. And someone else, often the founder or the COO, ends up resolving the complicated cases. Every single one of those minutes costs money.
Added to that is the lack of visibility. Without a centralized system, the equipment exists somewhere, but no one really knows where. No one knows what condition it is in. Nor whether the employee who left last month has already returned it.
What variables to consider when calculating hardware management
To estimate the real internal cost of managing hardware, it is advisable to look at least at these categories.
Operational time
Monthly IT hours spent on logistics coordination, equipment configuration, and delivery tracking.
HR hours spent on onboarding and offboarding linked to hardware.
Management time spent resolving exceptions or complex cases.
Unrecovered equipment
Percentage of assets that do not return when someone leaves.
Average value of each unrecovered equipment.
Cost of early replacement due to lack of stock visibility.
Purchases without process
Price difference between planned and emergency purchases.
Cost of purchasing without volume or negotiation with suppliers.
Time spent comparing options, managing warranties, and tracking.
Friction in onboarding
Average days of delay between someone's start date and the delivery of their equipment.
Estimated impact on productivity during that period.
Geographic expansion
Cost of researching suppliers in each new country.
Time spent understanding local regulations, import costs, and delivery times.
How much is your IT Manager's time worth when you use it for logistics
This is the most underestimated point. Probably because time does not have an associated invoice.
An IT Manager costs much more than their net salary: social contributions, benefits, tools. They are a technical profile with seniority, hired to solve infrastructure and systems problems. But part of their day is spent on something else: tracking an order, coordinating with a supplier, configuring equipment that arrived without the correct setup. That time also costs money, and it is not a small amount.
The exercise is simple. Estimate what percentage of their week is spent on hardware tasks. In companies without a defined process, that number is usually around 20% to 30%. In other words: between a fifth and almost a third of that role is paying for logistics, not IT.
And that's just one person. In most companies we know, HR and operations also absorb part of that burden. Even if no one records or measures it. When you add up all the roles that touch the process, the number grows much more than anyone would expect.
The Cost of Phantom Equipment
We use a term for a very common situation in companies with distributed teams: phantom assets. These are the devices that appear on some spreadsheet, or in someone's memory, but whose actual location is uncertain. They might be at a former employee's house. In a storage room that no one has checked in months. Or in transit for so long that no one remembers if they ever arrived.
In companies with 50 to 200 employees and normal turnover, it is not uncommon for 10% to 20% of the inventory to be in this state at any given point in the year. If each device is worth an average of USD 1,000 and the company has 100 assets, that represents up to USD 20,000 in hardware with questionable traceability.
The most expensive part comes later. Since no one knows if that device is available, when onboarding someone new, a replacement purchase is made that wasn't necessary. The asset existed. It's just that no one knew where.
What happens to the budget when there is no recovery process
Offboarding is the most critical moment in the life of an asset. And almost always the one with the least process defined.
When someone leaves, there is a lot to resolve at once: access, documentation, handovers. Hardware is left for last. And often, it doesn't have a clear owner. Does HR coordinate it? IT? The direct manager? Who notifies the employee that they need to return the equipment, within what timeframe, and where, if they are in another country?
When this process is not defined, one of three things usually happens. The equipment does not return. It returns late. Or it returns in a condition that prevents it from being reused. And with employees in other countries, the logistical complexity often means no one even tries.
This cost does not appear on any report. It is silently absorbed as part of the cost of turnover. And the cycle repeats.
Purchasing without processes and geographical expansion: two equally underestimated costs
There are two variables on the list that deserve their own paragraph. They usually appear together in companies that are growing.
The first is purchasing without a process. When there is no defined supplier or available stock, each new onboarding becomes a rushed search. You buy where you can, at the price available, with the time left. An emergency purchase can cost between 20% and 40% more than a planned one. And in a company that adds 20 or 30 people per year, that difference accumulates quickly. Without anyone registering it as an avoidable cost.
The second is geographical expansion. Every time the company hires in a new country, someone has to research from scratch. What suppliers are available. Which ones are reliable. What delivery times are like. What import restrictions apply. How the warranty is handled if something fails. This research costs real time. And it is repeated in each new market. For companies growing in LATAM, it is not a one-time expense: it is a recurring cost that no one budgets for.
When outsourcing makes clear sense and when it doesn't yet
Outsourcing hardware management is not the answer for every company or at all times. It is worth being honest here. The decision should be based on the real situation of each company, not on a sales pitch.
It makes clear sense when:
The company operates in more than two countries and coordinating logistics consumes IT or HR time.
The headcount is growing rapidly and onboarding equipment is a bottleneck.
There is no centralized visibility of inventory and assets are often lost.
The IT team is small and needs to focus on higher-value tasks.
There has already been at least one unrecovered device that caused a real problem.
It doesn't make as much sense yet when:
The company operates in only one country, with simple logistics.
The team is small, fewer than 15 or 20 people, and management is handled without friction.
An organized internal process already exists, with good traceability and no blind spots.
If you recognize two or more cases from your company in the first list, the calculation is probably already paying off.
How to build the number to present to the person who approves the budget
If you've made it this far and want to take this to a meeting, the strongest argument is not “the service costs X.” It's “not having it costs Y, and Y is greater than X.” The sum of four costs gives you the number.
Internal time: monthly hours multiplied by the hourly cost of each role.
Unrecovered equipment: lost assets per year multiplied by average value.
Purchases without process: price difference between planned and emergency purchases.
Friction in onboarding: days of delay multiplied by productivity impact.
That sum is the actual current cost. Then you compare it with the cost of the external service. And you evaluate what capabilities it adds that do not exist today: centralized visibility, defined recovery process, coverage in multiple countries.
Variable | Estimate | Approx. annual cost |
|---|---|---|
IT and HR time in hardware management (25% combined monthly dedication) | 2 people × 25% × monthly cost | USD 6,000 - 12,000 |
Unrecovered equipment (15% turnover, 10% unrecovered, average value USD 1,200) | 12 departures × 10% × USD 1,200 | USD 1,440 |
Additional cost due to purchases without process (25 hires × 25% markup × USD 1,200) | 25 × USD 300 | USD 7,500 |
Onboarding friction (5 days delay × 25 hires × productivity impact) | Variable depending on role and salary | USD 2,000 - 5,000 |
Estimated Total | USD 16,940 - 25,940 |
The numbers will vary according to each company. The point is not precision, but the order of magnitude. In this example, a medium-sized company would be absorbing between USD 17,000 and USD 26,000 a year in costs that have no name on any budget.
Conclusion
The question is not whether outsourcing hardware management has a cost. It does, and it's reasonable to want to understand it before deciding.
The real question is different. Is that cost higher or lower than what the company is already paying without knowing it? In most cases we see, doing the math changes the conversation. Not because the service is cheap. But because the internal cost was much higher than anyone had estimated. Simply put, no one had ever put it into numbers.
Once that number exists, the decision becomes much easier to make. And to defend.
You might also be interested in…
